User talk:Nerve net

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nerve net!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Nerve net!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Tutankhamon sarcofago.tif was uncategorized on 17 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Tutankhamon mascara.tif was uncategorized on 17 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Categorías

He categorizado tus fotos. Si tienes más fotos de Madrid son muy bienvenidas. Son de gran calidad. Yo me encargo de categorizarlas, sólo déjame un mensaje en mi discusión. Un saludo Triplecaña (talk) 18:06, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Están bien categorizadas. Triplecaña (talk) 21:02, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Male Kobus ellipsiprymnus at Cabacerno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 13:25, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Female Kobus ellipsiprymnus at Cabacerno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 11:05, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument to Jacinto Verdaguer y Santalo. Retiro Park. Madrid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:26, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a Ramon de Mesonero Romanos Madrid 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:45, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Nuestra Señora del Pueyo (Belchite, España) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 18:57, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viejo Belchite 20180709.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 18:57, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabeza Olmeca Ensanche de Vallecas 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juan Van Halen y Sarti busto Retiro Madrid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 17:06, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a Agustín Lara (Madrid) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The right crop is a bit unfortunate, the image would be better with a bit more contrast and vibrance. --Basotxerri 19:35, 15 November 2018 (UTC)  Comment I can crop out the right door but the resolution has to be lowered a bit and/or the subject has to be moved left, regarding increasing the contrast, no problem to do that but this will darken the shadows in subjects face. About vibrance. Do you mean saturation? Please give your feedbak. Regards. --Nerve net 13:14, 16 November 2018 (UTC) Lightroom which I use differences between saturation and vibrance but yes, mainly I thought about adding a bit more saturation. --Basotxerri 16:11, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monolito a Alfonso Castelao Parque de Breogan Madrid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a Ramon de Mesonero Romanos Madrid 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xalet de les Airasses.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 17:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de la Villa de Arévalo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 17:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Arevalo - fachada Sur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted and needs perspective correction. If you haven't got more image space left, you might get in trouble with the crop after fixing the perspective. --Basotxerri 19:37, 15 November 2018 (UTC) Comment IMHO no tilting needed, the land behind the castle has different heights giving that appearance. Regarding correcting perspective. I will check that and feedback soon. --Nerve net 14:32, 16 November 2018 (UTC)  Done Uploaded new version with perspective corrected. --Nerve net 01:34, 25 November 2018 (UTC)  Support Good now --Daniel Case 07:32, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a Juan Vazquez de Mella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check the verticals, there is some barrel distortion. --C messier 12:58, 17 November 2018 (UTC)  Done Applied lens corrections. --Nerve net 02:01, 25 November 2018 (UTC)  Support Better now --Daniel Case 07:27, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jarrón del puente de Toledo, Madrid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Nuestra Señora del Pueyo (Belchite, España) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cueva del Drach Mallorca 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiestas Orgullo Madrid Julio 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Looks fine at 3x my laptop screen, which is my standard and larger than the actual size of the file. -- Ikan Kekek 07:53, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Conde Fernán González 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:50, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Busto de Jose Fernandez Rodriguez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:48, 24 April 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Eatcha 08:52, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Ancient Greek metal toy soldiers.jpg

File:Ancient Greek metal toy soldiers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Verbcatcher (talk) 18:21, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I am sorry that this photo has a problem, because it is a high-quality image that would be good to have on Commons. I came across it in Category:Taken with Canon TS-E 24mm F3.5L, where I was looking because I am thinking of bidding for this lens in an auction.

I think that you used the tilt function of the lens to change the plane of focus, so that all the figures are in focus. It would be good to have a photo like this to illustrate the Tilt–shift photography and Scheimpflug principle articles in English Wikipedia, and the corresponding articles in other languages. For this purpose it would be better to have a photo with a background that is more obviously out of focus. Can you create something suitable? Otherwise I may try, if I win the auction. Regards, Verbcatcher (talk) 00:00, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Verbcatcher, yes I used the tilt function of this lens to move he plane of focus over all figures as much as possible.

Normally I use tilt to isolate subjects/parts of the image like here: https://www.canonistas.com/galerias/showphoto.php?photo=443336&title=remero&cat=500

and here: https://www.canonistas.com/galerias/showphoto.php?photo=437221&title=pyracantha-urbana&cat=500

But also tried what you are asking for here (with less success than with the toys): https://www.canonistas.com/galerias/showphoto.php?photo=438387&title=cinco-ca-f1os&cat=500

Let me review my pictures in order to see if I've something that meets your request. Nerve net (talk) 08:14, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Meninas Gallery 2022 33.jpg

Hi Nerve net, is this sculpture permanently installed at this location or only temporarily? --Túrelio (talk) 09:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Temporarily until December 15th, more information at https://meninasmadridgallery.com/ Nerve net (talk) 09:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. You are probably aware that these sculptures are copyrighted works of art and that a temporary installation in the public is not sufficient to be covered by Spain's freedom-of-panorama exception. Is there any established agreement between the sculptors and the gallery/organisation about permission of photos of their sculptures, taken during the exhibition on the street? Of course, it would be a pain if we had to delete all these images, but we need be sure about the copyright status of each image to prevent re-users getting into legal problems. Are you aware if there has been a previous deletion-discussion about this exhibition (in earlier years)? --Túrelio (talk) 09:27, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

First: Nothing is stated in any way at the website. Nerve net (talk) 10:14, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Second: Do you have asked this question also to all contributors of the images available at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Meninas_Madrid_Gallery? Nerve net (talk) 10:16, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Third: If you plan to raise a deletetion request please do so, but please do it for all images available at the category https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Meninas_Madrid_Gallery. So all contributors can respond you. Nerve net (talk) 10:18, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

To Second: I had simply assumed that you were also the photographer in the previous years. Seems that was not the case. --Túrelio (talk) 10:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Go ahead and ask them too please. Nerve net (talk) 10:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

If read corresponding Spanish Laws:

- https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rdlg/1996/04/12/1/con

- https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2018-5059

I'm not a lawyer but so far I could read, the current License CC BY-SA is not the right one to use as it allows the comercial ussage of the images, the comercial ussage is one of the topics that constantly appear in the reffered laws.

So I propose in a first attempt, to change the license of the images to CC BY-SA-NC: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

In Art. 32: It seems that images can be used freely without express permission of the author for educational o scientific investigation purposes. But I need help from other to ensure to not wrongly interpret this article of the law. Is there a group or team for such issues? Nerve net (talk) 10:55, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Changing to NC would make them incompatible with Commons, i.e. resulting automatically in deletion. As the problem has been ignored (by us all) for 3 years, we don't need to hurry now. I think I will open (likely not today) a regular (slow) DR for the 3 images from 2019 (other photographer) and 2021 (you) in order to get an evaluation/interpretation of the actual FoP-related jurisdiction in Spain wrt to "permanently installed". In case the result is negative (for our images), I would propose that either you or somebody from Wikimedia-Espana talks to the organizing gallery about the problem and its solution. --Túrelio (talk) 11:06, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Ok. Nerve net (talk) 11:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

When creating a new cat for the 2018 event (Category:Meninas Madrid Gallery 2018), I discovered that the problem is even more complex, as File:Ochenta Meninas inundarán Madrid esta primavera de la mano de Madrid Capital de Moda 01.jpg (and more images) seems to have been released by a local newspaper (from where our uploader it has taken) under a free license. But whether that license is valid in this case is also questionable, as it concerns the copyright of the artist and as FoP is clearly not applicable (indoors). --Túrelio (talk) 11:23, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, but what stands FoP for? Nerve net (talk) 11:34, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Freedom of panorama. --Túrelio (talk) 11:35, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

One last thing about this temporary exposition.

These sculptures will be sold at a charity auction after the temporary exhibition. The temporary exhibition will end on December 15th. So the owner of the sculptures will change.

So far I know the sculptures of the prior exhibitions were also sold in charity auctions. Nerve net (talk) 12:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Ok, though ownership is legally not relevant for copyright, which remains by the artist, if not actively transferred to the buyer. I'll try to open the DR until tomorrow. --Túrelio (talk) 17:11, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Meninas (2)-2019.jpg

File:Meninas (2)-2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 11:42, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Not at all :) Inuiren34 (talk) 16:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Warning

Hi Nerve net. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request: omitting subpage and transclusion. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. Warning: such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks, as "We cannot work here with people who are not willing to follow our procedures, in particular for deletion requests." You could also have used {{G7}}.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 02:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Ok, thank you Jeff.

As soon as possible I will review the links you provided regarding the topic.

I apologize for any inconvenience.

Regards. Javier. Nerve net (talk) 06:45, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Madrid 2020-05-01 04.jpg

File:Madrid 2020-05-01 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)